User:Emilyhg.371/2019 Visayas earthquake/Kratos11406 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dtkraft, Nicksalanitri, Emilyhg.371


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * 2019 Eastern Samar earthquake
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The first thing that this article does well is that it able to catch my eye immediately with the map of the earthquake and where it took place. What makes it impressive is that underneath the image we can see a lot of data that correlates with this earthquake, such as the time it took place, the date, the magnitude, the epicenter, and the amount of people that were injured. Something that I would add on to this article is a much more in-depth lead section, as it is only one sentence long and should have more writing to get the reader more knowledge of what they are about to read. The most important thing that these authors could do to improve the article would be to add more image of the aftermath of the damage that the earthquake made as well as more in-depth talk about the human action, damage, closeness to civilization and the cost of the economy and human lives that this earthquake costs. Something from your article that I can add to my own is the data that is shown after the image, I think it looks very professional and well made, which will only add to my article in making it look more professional and knowledgeable for the readers. This article shows a clear structure and has neutral content. The sources that are cited through the article are numerous and seem to come from credible sources so they did a good job on their sources. In general this article is coming across as good and well done, just needs to be edited and more polished.