User:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O Donuts/Anjsan01 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Emilyngu3


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O Donuts
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mighty-O Donuts

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * The lead was changed and it does reflect the new content added by you
 * Introductory sentence concisely and clearly describes the article topic
 * There is no description of the major sections, I would add more content to the lead section to provide a little more information about each section that you added to the article.
 * The lead is concise, but I think more information can be added to the lead to give it more detail and portray a more in depth representation of the remainder of the article

Content


 * Content is relevant to the topic
 * All content is up-to-date based on the references
 * No missing content or content that does not belong

Tone and Balance


 * The content is neutral and not biased towards as particular position
 * There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented
 * No attempted at persuasion in favor of any positions

Sources and References


 * All content is backed up by reliable secondary sources such as reliable news articles
 * The content is an accurate representation of the cited sources
 * The sources are very thorough and prove a lot of information on the donut shop and its history
 * The sources are all current
 * Link 2 does not work

Organization


 * The content is concise, clear and easy to read
 * There are no grammatical or spelling errors
 * Content is well organized and broken down into relevant sections that provide a good flow of information and major points

Images and Media


 * There were no images added by you

Overall Impressions


 * The content has improved the overall quality of the article by adding more clear sections and information that is relevant to the sections. There is also a good correlation between the lead and the sections
 * Strengths: There is a good amount of information that was added and it provides a lot of value to the article. The information helps the article a lot so I think you did a good job framing the article.
 * I think the lead needs more content, I think that it is a little vague given that the article has quite a bit of information.