User:Emilyseatvet/New Daisy Theatre/MaSoKiPo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)

Emilseatvet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emilyseatvet/firstdraft

The lead is currently vague because it is incomplete. The content is relevant to the topic with updated information to approximately two years ago. The history section is a simplified version of the topic over the course of history. There are no biases listed in the article detected. There are many reliable sources for the topic with current information provided about the topic in the article as evidence to a reliable and updated resource. The content is well-organized in terms of construction and legibility. The strengths of the content are how well-put the information is. Since this is just a simple first draft, improvements will be made in the future.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emilyseatvet/firstdraft


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Emilyseatvet/firstdraft

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is currently vague because it is incomplete. The content is relevant to the topic with updated information to approximately two years ago. The history section is a simplified version of the topic over the course of history. There are no biases listed in the article detected. There are many reliable sources for the topic with current information provided about the topic in the article as evidence to a reliable and updated resource. The content is well-organized in terms of construction and legibility. The strengths of the content are how well-put the information is. Since this is just a simple first draft, improvements will be made in the future.

Respond to Peer Review
This is very helpful information for me. I definitely need to take a look at the lead and work on that. I will look into more things to add to it. Thank you so much for your helpful peer review!