User:Emiserena/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Moisture Recycling
 * It is neutral but the article is very short. There are a lot of sources but the article contains only one paragraph. There is only one comment on the talk page.
 * Three of the sources that I clicked on came from the same website/source.
 * Three of the sources that I clicked on came from the same website/source.

Option 2

 * Velvet season
 * The first header talks about how the article might be confusing and I can understand where they are coming from. There is only one paragraph and It's on the origin of the topic and doesn't explain it much.
 * There are three sources on the wiki page.The one source I clicked didn't work.
 * There are three sources on the wiki page.The one source I clicked didn't work.

Option 3

 * Sertao
 * It is relevant to the topic, all the information but there isn't much there. It's written neutrally but they claim that it has been affecting the farmers with no citations. There is only one citation. The sources all seem fine, from universities. The talk page did make sense, I also saw the same problems.
 * The links are from universities but there is a fiction one?
 * The links are from universities but there is a fiction one?
 * The links are from universities but there is a fiction one?

Option 4

 * Older Peron
 * This article needs a lot of help. It says what it is and then says that it might not be what it is. Neutral tone though. In the talk section, they said someone had removed a lot of the article.
 * The sources I could access, I didn't know how much they could support this article.
 * The sources I could access, I didn't know how much they could support this article.
 * The sources I could access, I didn't know how much they could support this article.

Option 5

 * Mousterian Pluvial
 * I'm going to be honest, I don't like how the article was written. I feel like it was written towards an upper level of elementary school. The tone is neutral. It's rated as a stub. There is no comments in the talk section.
 * There are two sources with no outgoing links. They are just papers I would have to see if I could get access to.
 * There are two sources with no outgoing links. They are just papers I would have to see if I could get access to.
 * There are two sources with no outgoing links. They are just papers I would have to see if I could get access to.