User:Emjackson500/Evaluate an Article

User:Emjackson500/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Personal-event memory

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because there is a lot of room for improvement (language, citations, expanding on what is already there, etc).

Evaluate the article
The lead section has a good introductory sentence, but does not adequately set up the rest of the article. There is definite room for improvement in the topic sentence.

The content of the article is relevant, but relatively scarce. They reference relevant sources, and relevant cognitive elements to the topic, which is important. However, I think there could be more material overall.

The tone of the article is really good, but I think the language could be improved. The article is neutral and does not seem to have an apparent bias and the writer does not seem to persuade or argue anything

There are 14 total references, but one of them is a wikipedia article. They are relevant sources, relatively current, but again, could be improved and expanded upon and perhaps updated.

The article is digestible but can read a little juvenile at some points, so that could also be improved. I also think the organization could be more intuitive. Additionally, it doesn’t contain any types of media, but I think due to the nature of the article, it could be useful to add some visual cues.

The talk page is underperforming and could be improved. When I update the article, I will be speaking in there.

Lastly, overall, the article could be improved by improving the organization, the language, and by expanding upon what is already there. Considering it is and S-class article, there is room for improvement.