User:Emjo2000/Stimming/A3341816 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Emjo2000


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Emjo2000/Stimming - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Stimming - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I can't say entirely too much about the article since it is not that long. However, the lead for the article is in good shape and I am assuming that this article is on the newer side. When I was reading through your sandbox, I found your edits to be really good and fullfilling for this article along with the sources as well. I feel like your tone in your sandbox and in the article came from a neutral standpoint. While I did not see many things backed in the article, I can see within your sandbox that your sources back up what you are saying. I had a problem accessing your third source but that could be just my computer. I find the pictures informing in the article and I can correlate them to certain parts of the article. I believe your content will improve this article and help it reach a new potential. The only thing that I would look at is your spelling. I noticed a couple of words that were misspelled within your sandbox. Overall great work!