User:EmlyCole/Iron oxide copper gold ore deposits/Pavneetah Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

EmlyCole


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:EmlyCole/Iron oxide copper gold ore deposits
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Iron oxide copper gold ore deposits

Lead Section
There was no lead section drafted, however since an article already exists the draft seems to be adding on to the body of the article.

Content
I think the draft is a great addition of text with important aspects like the Economic mineral and the features. This piece of text definitely adds things that were missing in the main article.

Tone and Balance
All of the text is written in neutral tone and suggestive wording is not used. There are no viewpoints taken while also addressing the controversy around the factors that control the ore formation. In the future if you decide to add more about mining, biases might be something to watch out for. Overall, the draft is well balanced and each subheading talks about the text that is fitting for that area and does not outweigh another.

Sources and References
All the references used are reliable and come from scientific journals, all of the links work and the information associated with them matches the text. Throughout the paper the references are repeated so I would just suggest to add more references if possible. All the references are current and not out of date, the oldest one being from 2001.

Structure and Organization
The draft is easy to read and understand and written at a level that would be accessible to most readers looking for this information. To make it more comprehensive you could add links to other wikipedia pages that talk about the terms you mention in the paper. The draft overall is well laid out and broken into sections that make it easy to follow along and understand.