User:Emma.Keary/Ornamental Gardens, Ottawa/ProBuss Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Clarity -

This article has clearly defined sections and a well established lead paragraph. I think there are a few things that can make this article slightly more clear. I would change the wording of the first sentence in the mineral chemistry section. Additionally, I think this article can benefit from slightly more context in the geography section.

Structure -

This article is written in a well structured manor. It has clearly defined sections and has a logical flow following the lead section. It begins with introducing the topic then in the article body briefly goes over the geography and mineral chemistry. Additional sections may be added if more information is available. The structure of this article could benefit from something like a section regarding the history of the Ornamental Gardens. Otherwise, the structure is very clear and well constructed.

Balance of coverage -

This article has a decent amount of coverage for the chosen topic. One suggestion for the improvement of the balance of coverage is to talk more about the roles of the mineral that are used in the gardens. Additionally, the coverage of the geography section could go in more depth. Otherwise this article displays the various facets of this topic effectively.

Neutrality -

This article was well written when considering a neutral tone. There are no signs of bias and the tone seems consistent throughout. This article also avoids subjective statements. It reads though like other published wiki articles, nice!

Sources -

The sources that have been used all open up and are usable. There doesn't seem to be any information that was not cited which is great. This topic seems to be well researched and the sources all appear to be from academic sources.

Suggestions for improvements -

Overall, nice work! The only suggestions that I would make are to beef up the geography section and to talk more about the roles of the different mineral used in these gardens. Additionally, if you can find it, I would suggest a brief history section to really round out the topic. You used a neutral tone an covered you topic effectively, keep up the good work!