User:Emma Chamber/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Glycerol phosphate shuttle
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

I have chosen this article to evaluate because it gives a brief overview of the topic of interest. It is short, to the point and it gives the reader a quick incite to what they are looking for. Most importantly it is very organized and gives me a good idea as to what the wikipedia page should look like.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? No
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There will be areas where the mechanism will be mentioned, why the topic is important, what would happen if the topic no longer worked or didn't exist.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is rated well. Not part of any WikiProjects
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? In class we go into it in a little more detail as compared to wikipedia. In class we go into the topic in a more chemical perspective while wikipedia just goes about it more generally.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Well-developed article.
 * What are the article's strengths? Organization, being concise, and neutralization
 * How can the article be improved? Just add in some more information about what would happen it the topic no longer worked or didn't exist.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? The article is well-developed could be expanded on a little bit more.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: