User:Emmacaelin/sandbox

ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
-Each fact does not have a clear cited source, such as the first sentence of the last paragraph in the beginning section, the part about plants adapted to soil in an area not needed added nutrition. The boron section also has no sources cited.

-The hydroponics system section did not give much information about plant nutrition and seemed kind of distracting and extraneous, like a lot of the information in the boron section under micronutrients.

-The information seems to primarily come from universities and scholarly papers, based on the references section. It seems to be very reasonable and reliable at a first glance and I did not see a source that was a glaring error in judgment to add.

-The information is a bit outdated, most of it is at least twenty years old but not so outdated that it should be dismissed based solely on its age. Research doesn't always prove to be out of date so I don't think this needs to be.