User:Emmadeitz/Hillbilly Highway/Turnwaldm Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Emmadeitz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Emmadeitz/Hillbilly Highway


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hillbilly Highway

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead- You do not currently have an updated lead section. When you start rewriting your lead make sure to include an overview of the new content you add.

Content- The content fits our focus of Appalachia. The content that you have so far seems to fit the topic, and the information is up to date. I think as you add more content it may be helpful if you start adding content into specific sections of the article.

Tone and Balance- Your tone is appropriate, academic, and objective. Your viewpoints are diversified and none of the language you use is implicitly biased. As you add more content, make sure to continue adding a diversity of viewpoints especially if you expand more on the specific groups of people involved with the migration.

Sources and References- You did not list any sources. Make sure to add the websites and references as you add your content so you can better organize your citations.

Organization- Your content is hard to follow but your wordchoice makes sense. I think you can probably understand your current organization a bit better than I, but as you continue working consider adding headings so you know where you intend to put the final writing.

Images and Media- I think the article could benefit by having some pictures. The current article has no images, but that might be due to what images can be used that relate to the topic. A photo of the regions where the migration occurred or a map may visualize the information.