User:Emmakent/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Fitness and figure competition

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose to evalutae this article because it is something that I am genuenly intrested in and something that I would love to compete in one day. I love learning more about the origins of figure competitions and aswell as knowing how it has been so noormilized withitn the fitness community. Reading and evaluating this article will allow me to learn much more about the topic and learn about how it came to be in the first place.

Evaluate the article
LEAD SECTION: The lead section has some good and some bad about the little bit. The lead section is quick and to the point, it shares what is figure comeption very breifly and in very minimal detail. For a lead section being short and sweet is important the the redaer but also it is important to have detail included within the lead section to grab the attention of the redaer and come across as almost like a hook. The lead section has minimal detail and a minimal description defining the difference between body building and figure competitions. The difference ebtween the two is very important because they are so so different in the sense of how poeple prepare for it, and what people expcet form it. The lead section could deffintly have a the technical description between figure competion and bodybuilding and not just a couple words.

CONTENT: In the overview section we learn heavily what the differenve between fitness, bodybuilding and figure competitions and what they entail for women. The content of this article is clear, persise, and to the point. There is no rambeling on information that may not be relevent to the subject and the article explains in great detail the origins of these competions as a whole, and how they have grown to the comeptions they are today. I really like how they devide the subjects of teh comptions into proticons and have titles/ headings to differentiate the sbjects of comeptions to allow the author to add detail to one form of comeption at a time. Overall, i really enjoyed the information eithin the article and how it really explains the difference in all figure comeptiotons and the requirements to compete in the certain forms of competitions.

TONE: The tone within this article is very neutral and has zero opinion or bias at all. The tone of the article is inoformative because they are explaining and teaching all about the figure competions.

ORGANIZATION: The article is very organized, using headings, subheadings, titles and bolded text to add empasis on spcefic topics and important words so that the reader highlights them as they are reading the article

IMAGES AND MEDIA: Within the article there is a definite use of images to add to the article showing how women look during each different form of competiond what it entails for women within each competition prep.

TALK PAGE: The talk page seemed to have played an impact wihtitn the article and the edits that have been made to the article. Many points/conversations on the talk page consist of "this article needs images", "this article needs more detail"etc.... After all these points have been made it seemed like the author went in and fixed a bunch of details that the readers have talked/informed.

OVERALL: Overall the article is good. There are defintitly things that can be chnaged or imporved inorder to have the upmost detail that could be important to the reader. For example talking more about the preperation phase of figure competions and the requirements for the competions, etc... These things are important information that should be added within the topic to add more into the article and make it much more informative. Other than that I liked the artcile and it was informative and had images to really show the difference between all forms of competition.