User:Emmalauren19/National Civil Rights Museum/Zynxo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Emmalauren19


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Emmalauren19/National Civil Rights Museum
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * National Civil Rights Museum

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead section provides a good, concise description of the article and is fairly easy to understand. The only thing I'd consider removing is the part that says "King died at St. Joseph's Hospital" as it isn't super important to the overall article and could be discussed later on in the more detailed sections. Everything else seems to link well with all the added content.

All the content I see seems relevant to the topic at hand. The added content provides a great addition to the information already there as it goes a little farther into the history of the motel. Everything is up-to-date as well. There is some room to add more detail about the exhibits and what they consist of especially since the museum has been renovated and updated.

From what I can tell, this article is neutral. There is no bias towards any views and every view seems represented fairly and equally.

All of the added content comes from reliable sources and reflect them well. There is also a diverse variety of sources used too which is good.

There are a few images included in the article but I think they could be updated to show the more recent renovations. Images of some of the exhibits would be interesting.

Overall this article and the newly added content all seem high quality. It is more complete with the added content and the article does a great job at providing details about the National Civil Rights Museum.