User:Emmalauren19/sandbox

Evaluating an article

Justin Timberlake

When first pulling up the page, the lead section is very detailed. The intro sentence is clear and addresses some of the most important information pertaining to Justin. It includes small mentions of information covered in the rest of the page. I feel like the given information in the lead section is very concise. The content of the article is written very well. It is all about Justin's career and is up to date. Nothing seems to be missing and the page flows well. The article does not deal with an equity gap. The tone of this article is very neutral since Justin Timberlake is seen as unproblematic. Most of the information is factual and not misleading whatsoever. This article has a lot of sources and references, most of them being renown publishing sites such a Billboard, Rolling Stone, Vanity and Vanity Fair. There is also information from ancestry.com, The Times, and a few writers who have done extensive research to publish Biography's. Since he is such a big celebrity, sources like this are probably the most helpful, whereas it may hurt the credibility in another article. Some of the links I clicked on did not work and should be updated. The article is very well written with few to none grammatical errors. It is easy to read and it is broken up into topics which makes it easy to navigate and find information quickly. There are many images throughout the article which are located by the corresponding topics. The captions explain exactly what is happening and enhance the article. The talk page does not have a lot going on. There is a few things that have been suggested but most have been denied. The article is B class and apart of multiple Wikiprojects.

Overall this is a great article. It gives a lot of details about Justin Timberlake and is very helpful. It is a bit long and some of the numbers need to be updated.