User:Emmamullins24/Tracey Weldon/SarahHiggins3 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Emma Mullins


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emmamullins24/Tracey_Weldon/SarahHiggins3_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) I believe that Emma's introductory sentence could have included more information about what the page was about.
 * 2) Emma seems to be precise throughout the entire page, but I do believe she could add more detail.
 * 3) The content is very interesting on the other hand
 * 4) The content is relevant to the topic
 * 5) I do not believe Emma added any content that does not belong
 * 6) I believe Emma did a great job with speaking on the information she researched instead of adding any of her personal beliefs
 * 7) Emma did add a well organized reference page, meaning all of her work was backed up
 * 8) Emma also did a good job of picking current sources. All of her's are from 2020-2022.
 * 9) Yes the content is clear and easy to read
 * 10) I do not believe there are any grammatical errors
 * 11) Links do work
 * 12) The content is well organized
 * 13) Overall, I believe Emma did an amazing job, I would personally just add a few more sections for information