User:Emmamwasserman/Reproductive labor/Priyanshuuprety Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Emma Wasserman


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emmamwasserman/Reproductive_labor?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Reproductive labor

Evaluate the drafted changes
Based on the edits I saw, it seems as though the content you have added is very relevant to the topic and it seems as though it is up to date based on the dates listed for your references. I think you do a good job of centering an intersectional approach in your edits and it contributes to closing equity gaps in terms of the information available in this article. I thought that the language you used was very neutral and informative, and did not look to persuade the reader in any way. I think you have a good variety of sources and your sources seem like they are very relevant to the topic that you are writing about. I think your organization definitely makes sense and has a logical flow when reading the information you have outlined.

In terms of feedback, I know the guidelines for peer reviews above asked certain questions about the Lead section of your edits and I don't think I saw a Lead section in your draft. However, it might not be required for this assignment so if it's not required, I don't think you have to worry about it. If it is something that is required, I would just follow the guidelines above and add a couple of sentences about the edits that you are choosing to make for this article and why, as well as a concise description about the article's main focus. As I mentioned above, I think the information you included in your edits seem up to date but I wonder if there are any other sources out there on this topic that are from more recent years as well. Other than these minor things, I think these edits are written very well and I think they do a great job of adding to the article in an informative yet non biased manner.