User:Emmazjia/Social structure of China/Jiayi Li Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Emmazjia
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Emmazjia/Social structure of China

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead has been updated and reflects new content added by peers. The lead also contains a concise and clear introduction to the theme of the article and a brief description of the whole article. And it does not contain the information that is not in the article, I think the main content is concise, very good!

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
The content added is relevant to the topic and is also up to date. The whole article summed up very well without deviating from the subject. The article has no equity gaps and does not address historically underrepresented populations or themes.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The content added in this article is neutral and does not seriously favour a particular position. The structure of Chinese society is well written, and the added content does not attempt to persuade readers to support or stay away from another position.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
All the new content is a reliable second-hand source of information, the source is very complete, whether they reflect the available literature on the subject, these resources are recent. sources are written by different authors who are not historically marginalized when possible, and these links are operational.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The content added is simple and clear, easy to read, and also the content added is not a lot of grammatical or spelling errors. The content added in the article is well organized, breaking down a lot of reflecting the main points of the topic to make the reader more convenient to read.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
There are no images and media evaluation in your article.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Overall, content organization is very good to express China's social structure incisively and vividly. At the beginning of each paragraph, a sentence summarizing the general content of each paragraph is written to make it easy for readers to understand. I think you can also write about whether the changes in Chinese social structure will affect people's lives and so on. In short, your article is very good! Well done!