User:Emmitross/Architectural mythology/Alutts Peer Review

General info
Emmitross
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emmitross/Architectural_mythology?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Architectural mythology

Lead

 * The lead provides a concise and intelligently phrased description of the article topic, though it does not introduce the body paragraphs directly.
 * While the quote provided directly below the lead section is relevant to the topic, I don't feel that it was necessary to include for the informational purposes of the article. In addition, I thought this quote could have been formatted differently, to make it stand out from the lead and body text.

Content

 * The content in the body sections was all relevant, though I felt that there could have been more information added to the section on Roman architecture, as there is only one example talked about briefly under this section.

Tone & Balance

 * There is no bias or favor that I detected within the article.

Sources & References

 * All references are from reliable sources and are varied and relatively current.
 * All new information is cited and represents the sources well, and the links work.

Organization

 * I found each section to be clear and concise, and split into easy to interpret sections.
 * Other than a few extra commas I did not notice any grammatical errors.

Images & Media

 * There is an image for each section that supports an example provided within the text.
 * However, I felt that specifically for the section on Ancient Rome, the picture could have better represented the mythological characters of the building, as that is the topic of the article.
 * Captions are accurate and all pictures adhere to copyright rules.

Strengths

 * I feel that the changes made were beneficial to the conciseness of the article and added relevant information.
 * The editor both expanded on previous sources of the article and added new, relevant references.

Improvements

 * I feel it would be helpful to briefly mention the body sections within the lead to provide an outline of the information to come.
 * Personally, I would remove or reformat the quote immediately following the lead, to set it apart from the text within the body and lead.
 * Include additional examples and information to the section on Ancient Rome if possible, as well as select an image that better represents the mythological aspects of the structure.