User:Emw3181/Amplexus/Emilygeorge06 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing: Emw3181
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Emw3181/Amplexus

Lead
I think that the introductory sentence of the lead paragraph introduces the concept of amplexus well. However, my one concern after reading through the lead paragraph is that it may be a bit overly detailed — perhaps the student could consider moving some of the information to other sections within the article to make it a little more concise.

Content
The content added to the draft article is all relevant to the topic of amplexus and all sources are up-to-date. I think that the student did well in their research on this topic and developing their ideas. There is certainly a large difference in the content that was included in the original stub article compared to what has been added in the article. There is no content that I think does not belong in the draft article, I think that the newly added information provides a strong explanation on the concepts of amplexus.

Tone and Balance
The tone of the draft article is neutral and there does not seem to be any indication of bias presented.

Sources and References
All sources used in the draft article are reliable and up-to-date and were used appropriately in supporting their ideas. The only issue that I had found when clicking through some of the sources was that the link provided for the first citation by Mollov, Popgeorgiev, Naumov, Tzankov and Stoyanov (2010) did not work. Consider reviewing this.

Organization
Overall, I think that the organization of the draft article was relatively well organized in its structure. The one note that I will reiterate was the same comment made on my critique of the lead paragraph, and that is just to move some of the more detailed information into other sections of the article so that the content in the opening of the draft is not so heavy. I think this would really improve the organization of the draft article overall. There seemed to be no grammatical or spelling errors. The draft is well written.

Images and Media
There were no additional images or media added to the draft article.

Overall impressions
After comparing the stub article to the draft article I definitely think that there has been great improvement in the content provided on the topic of amplexus. I think that the newly added information is well written and that it compliments the previously written content quite well. I think that with a little review in terms of the organization of the content overall that this draft will make a great addition to the Wikipedia platform. It is evident that the student conducted a lot of external research in order to get this much additional information on the topic of amplexus and I think that really shows through in the content that was written for this draft. Well done, I learned a lot ! Thanks.