User:Enelly23/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Amazon (company)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article because my family and I use Amazon often in our daily lives. This peaks my curiosity because I want to learn how I am personally contributing to climate change due to my use of this company. Amazon is also a growing company that has a strong hold on retail accross the world. This potentially means it has a strong impact on climate change.

Evaluate the article
Overall, I believe this is a valuable article to evaluate due to the key aspects listed above. The introductory line describes exactly what the article covers and describes the topic of the article in detail. While the article may not directly list out what sections it will cover, it provides some insight into how to article will flow in its structure. The layout of each section is structured in a manner that flows and is easy to follow. The lead is slightly lengthy but does not include information not present in the article. The content is also relevant and up to date, and does not include non-relevant information. However, it does not really address equity gaps that I noticed. As for tone and balance, the article is neutral and non biased. It does not take sides or side with a specific point of view. Finally, it does not try to persuade the reader. Resources are reliable, non-biased, with working links and are covered by diverse authors. As stated above, it has a clear and flowing structure/ organization, as well as clear, concise, and easy to read writing, with no spelling or grammatical errors. This article includes various forms of imagery, from pictures to tables. While there are not many conversations in the article, there are some comments ranging from changing to cover picture to questions about the number of contractors. Wikipedia addresses this company in a broad way that leaves space for research on emissions and climate change. Overall, in my opinion this article is educated, detailed, and very strong. It covers broad areas of the company anywhere from costs and revenue to locations and storefronts to services, products, and employees. One change, however, that I would make is to make it slightly more concise.