User:Englishbulldog2023/Trojan Horse/$tudent22 Peer Review

First, I would like to say the article was very informative, and in one way or another I got all my questions about the Trojan Horse answered throughout the article.

A few suggestions I have:


 * The information that is needed is all there, however, it could be organized in a way that is a little more straightforward. It felt very overwhelming with a lot of information coming at the reader all at once.
 * More citations, especially in the initial section of the article, would help with the credibility of the article as a whole.
 * Maybe add more information about the building of the horse itself, or who specifically had the idea of a "peace offering" to Troy

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)