User:Enguyen27/Cupressus sempervirens/Jweave23 Peer Review

General info
Enguyen27
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * he already published it to the main space and there is no sandbox so I just linked the article twice.:Cupressus sempervirens
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cupressus sempervirens

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of this article could use more information on what is in the article. It is very descriptive on the origin and distribution of this plant. The lead has not been updated to the content that was recently added. The content added is relevant and contributes good information to the article. There are two "uses" sections so combining those two make one should be done. The habitats section is well written and descriptive. The content that has been added is neutral and professional beside the few misspelled words and grammatical errors. One recommendation from me is to make the writing more succinct and with less fluff. There is a good list of references and a well done bibliography. The sources appear to be from different authors and are relatively current and updated information. The two images added enhance the topics and provide good visual aid. Italicizing the scientific name in the image description should be done. Overall the additions to this article are well done and backed by sources. Nothing else to change beside what is listed above.