User:EnigmaMcmxc/archive8

2016 Year in Review

 * a very belated thank you for these :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:22, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:


 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Battle of Caen
You might want to have a look at the talk page....Regards Keith-264 (talk) 07:43, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Nice to see you around Enigma....;o)Keith-264 (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Just noticed that the dispute resolution has been closed - I'd forgotten all about it! Keith-264 (talk) 23:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi EnigmaMcmxc. As I'm sure you are aware, an objective admin has now reviewed the article and has also concluded that there are indeed problems with neutrality. However Keith-264 is still blocking the corrective action, despite abundant reliable sources, and is now also repeatedly reverting my neutrality tag. Are you still prepared to help with an RfC, or should this perhaps go to the NPOV Noticeboard instead? Wdford (talk) 08:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah well, at least you tried....Keith-264 (talk) 23:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for today's 38th (Welsh) Infantry Division, "a British Army division that fought in several of the main battles of the First World War"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Five years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:03, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for today's 70th Infantry Division, "a short-lived British unit (with it's origins in the 6th and 7th Infantry Divisions) that fought during the latter stages of the Siege of Tobruk, before being dispatched to India and broken up to reinforce the Chindits."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Six years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:54, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

18th Div
I've sorted out my distractions for the moment and am going to have another dash tomorrow morning. Out of curiosity, why do you write Cite book instead of cite book? Keith-264 (talk) 22:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Copy and paste job. Does the capitalization effect the template?
 * Again, thank you for the help on this. The detail from the British OH has really improved the understanding of the fighting in Malaya, and hope it will do the same for on Singapore Island. I have slowly been working my way through the 59th Div article, only just got around to copyediting the Normandy section. Don't suppose you have any ideas for breaking up the long piece of text for 39-44?EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 23:03, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll have a butcher's.Keith-264 (talk) 23:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated! EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 23:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Keith-264/sandbox3 there's a section on Galmanche and La Bijude in here.Keith-264 (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Wo! It went from overbearing to very reasonable! Thanks! Will take a look at your sandbox when I start work on the Normandy section, cheers for that.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

38th (Welsh) Infantry Division scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the 38th (Welsh) Infantry Division article has been scheduled as today's featured article for November 26, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/November 26, 2017. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 17:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , thanks for selecting the article for the front page. I have read through the main page text, and have no modifications to make or suggest.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

18th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article 18th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) has been completed.

This sentence appears in the lead: "The 18th Infantry Division was formed in September 1939, as a 2nd Line duplicate of the 54th (East Anglian) Infantry Division."

"2nd Line" is used here, but "second line" is used elsewhere in the Background section in a foot note, and further in the section is written as "Second Line" several times. I looked online to try to resolve this inconsistency without success. Perhaps one of your sources will help with this.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:46, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The Gospel according to Joslen uses the term "First Line" and "Second Line". I do not have the time today to make further edits, but will make this consistency fix as soon as possible. If you have additional questions, please let me know. I will endeavor to look over your work and thank you properly once I get the chance :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 23:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks good, thank you so much for your work on this! :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * You're most welcome.Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 23:47, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 18th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 18th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 08:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 18th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)
The article 18th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:18th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:


 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
 * updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

70th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the 70th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 10, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/October 10, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Italian invasion of France
Not overlooked, actually. I would have reverted but for a recent discussion here. Whatever the motive, the IP has a point. I added the deleted statement to the aftermath section instead of restoring it to the infobox. Srnec (talk) 03:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delayed response, thanks for the info.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 01:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.

Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurt Knispel.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kurt Knispel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:First-Army.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:First-Army.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * 55th (West Lancashire) Infantry Division ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/55th_%28West_Lancashire%29_Infantry_Division check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/55th_%28West_Lancashire%29_Infantry_Division?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Preston, David French, Lancaster and Territorial Army

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

55th West Lancs Division
Hi. No sooner requested than done!Rickfive (talk) 11:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Much obliged! EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello 1990, nice to see you around. Keith-264 (talk) 01:22, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Here and there Keith, hope all is well :)EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I have a job and a cold but I'm bearing up well, it hasn't turned into Manflu yet. ;O) Keith-264 (talk) 23:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Treaty of Versailles
on Treaty of Versailles, you added many Harvard style citations around last year that do not point to any book. Please fix them by adding the book they refer to in a Bibliography Section.Eddie891 Talk Work 15:36, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Quite, I forgot about this. Thanks for the reminder, I shall work on this momentarily.

Hello
Nice to see you back. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 10:10, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

23rd Div number
Hi

Thanks for the extra to the 23rd (N) division, it was little more than a stub when I first saw it, and I nearly had a relative in that formation, 11th DLI briefly then back to the 8th.

I had a note in the text about the choice of number for the division, 23rd not 63rd, and even thought there isn't a reference to that decision in any history I could find, I think I built a logical case for it, which may even have been the original one, who knows? OK, it wasn't explicitly referenced, but fluff!? Seriously, this may have been the case for a number of other WW2 2nd line Territorial divisions, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th and 38th, do you know if any of those has a reference to the numbering decision? Usedtoknowthat (talk) 15:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't say that commenting about a potential link to the First World War division was fluff, but tenuous and linking the two as related appears to be unsourced.
 * In the First World War, initially only the regular divisions were numbered. The Territorial Force had names "Northumberland Division", for example. The next numbered divisions came from the New Army. When those numbers were allocated, and the decision was made to deploy the Territorial Force, the territorials were numbered in the order they were deployed. Those First Line numbers were kept when the Territorial Army was created in the 20s.
 * When the order was given to expand the Territorial Army, per F. W. Perry, it appears no outline was given on numbering or naming schemes from division down to battalion. It appears they picked what they wanted, resulting in a mix of New Army numbers, First World War Second Line numbers, and some just continuing the overall number sequence or filling in the gaps.
 * With that said, it appears that only the 42nd and 43rd divisions used their First World War era 2nd line numbers: the 66th and 45th. The 44th's second line during the First World War was the 67th, but when they duplicated during the Second they chose the New Army Number. Likewise, for the 15th, 18th, and 38th; they don't match the original 2nd line numbers. Roger Hesketh, in his work on the Fortitude deception plan, notes that when the Army starting disbanding divisions in 1944 they renamed several to match numbers and names the public should have been familiar with, such as the 38th Welsh; famed for several notable battles during the First World War. One could speculate this was also part of the random numbering the divisions opted for ala the original note in the article of the First World War's 23rd Division being rather famous.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 20:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

23rd (Northumbrian) Division‎
Hello:

The copy edit your requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article 23rd (Northumbrian) Division has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck as you move the article forward to FAC.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the delay, thank you for your work on the article.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Nice to see you back
User:Keith-264/sandbox4 here's the revised version of the AASF article but now I've got a job and found a new source it's taking ages. Keith-264 (talk) 14:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I know that feeling! On and off, slow and steady. Personally looking to improve a few more army division articles for the time being. Good luck with the new job :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * "Potez 637 over Villers-sur-Meuse".
 * Our chaps went all 18th Century on our French allies? May want to point out in the draft, that this was a friendly fire incident if that is the case. I had to click into the Potez article to find out what kind of machine it was since I was unfamiliar with the Luftwaffe having any.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 23rd (Northumbrian) Division
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 23rd (Northumbrian) Division you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:40, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Copy edit of 9th (Highland) Infantry Division
Hi EnigmaMcmxc. I was going to pick up this off the GoCE Requests page, but thought that I would check with you first. I think that you have an idea of how I go about copy editing by now, and if you would rather I left it for another GoCE copy editor to do I won't be in the slightest bit offended; let me know. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I have no issues with you taking a swing at the article. Many of the suggestions and improvements you have made on the other two you have worked on, I have tried to implement with this one. If you are willing, by all means go for it. I will assist as best as I can with changes and responses to talkpage queries about info I have made too complicated :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Query: "the Admiralty grew concerned at the ability of German airborne forces and the poised towards Scapa Flow, or a large scale attack against eastern Scotland" I am a little confused by "and the poised towards Scapa Flow". What is this meant to communicate? Gog the Mild (talk) 08:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Apart from that query, I think that that is me done. A well written little article. Gog the Mild (talk) 09:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * That should have read "...and the threat they posed...". A typo and some missing words on my part. I have not made a change to the article at the moment, in case you feel there is a better way to word that. I hope that helps? :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 16:17, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. No, your wording sounds fine. A bit of a rush job from me, but there wasn't that much that needed doing. IMO it is looking good. If it is going to GAN, give me a ping and I would be happy to assess it. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks you, once again. I am waiting to access a couple of other sources to see if there is any other information I can use to expand a few parts of the article and give a more broader picture. Afterwards, I will be nominating the article for GA status. At that point, I will give you a holla :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 16:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Gog, if you are still interested, I would appreciate a look over the article anticipating a GA push in a few days? I finally go access to one source, which did not provide anything else to add and I am doubtful much changes would be made from the other if I am ever able to get a hold of it. So I think of pushing ahead with what we have.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi. A few fiddly tweaks made, but it looks GAN ready to me. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 23rd (Northumbrian) Division
The article 23rd (Northumbrian) Division you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:23rd (Northumbrian) Division for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:42, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Michael Wittmann‎
Hi, I'm wondering if you'd be interested in doing a joint GA nomination. The article is well-sourced and is stable, so seems like a good candidate. Please let me know. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, but not for this article. I do not have the sources that deal with items outside of Villers-Bocage, so do not believe I would be able to help much if sections area questioned. I feel, based off the overhaul that you gave the article, you should take lead on this. Good luck :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the feedback. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Becke
Hello EnigmaMcMxc, I now have both Becke volumes 2A and 2B for an entire month thanks to interlibrary loan. Do you have any articles other than the 55th Division that you want me to look over? Now that I have got both volumes, I am willing to "mine" them for all the data in them. Kges1901 (talk) 21:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much.
 * For the 55th, we need to whip the OOB and commander list into shape; make sure the page numbers are correct and so we can also remove the over-indulgence in sources and weblinks. If there is anything else in there that can help expand the article, that would also be great.
 * After that, I intended - after finishing off a few more Second World War focused articles - to give the 54th (East Anglian) Infantry Division a shot, assuming I can locate the required sources; so whipping the OOB and commander list into shape with the sources you have as prep would be awesome :) Outside of that, I think I am going to have my hands full for the time being on articles. If you are willing, there are a bunch of TA articles that the sources could be used for though.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * How much do you want to have mentioned in the OOB? Becke has details on when all of the 1914 division units left for France which could be added to the 1914 OOB. For the 1916–1918 OOB, amalgamations can be listed (though I've written about the reduction of battalions in the prose section already). Kges1901 (talk) 21:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that would be a valuable piece of information to add to the OOB. My last collaboration on a First World War article resulted in the 38th (Welsh) Infantry Division, I believe the same level of information should be sufficient in the OOB. The additions you have made are very much appreciated.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 21:16, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've just found that thanks to Fold3 I have access to most of the Naval & Military Press reprints, for our purposes notably including Wyrall, Becke, Joslen, and both the WWI and WWII official histories. So if you want to take the 55th to a higher assessment level, I can assist as co-nominator. Kges1901 (talk) 22:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I have a physical copy of Joslen (the N+M Press reprint), so I am okay on that front. Any further assistance from Becke and Wyrall (previously only limited access via Google Books) would be much appreciated. I am currently working on a basic outline for the Cambrai section, and plan on going over the prior sections to add historical assessment once I find suitable material.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , does Becke state which artillery units were transferred from the division during the fighting at Cambrai? Coop doesn't mention it, and it is one of the factors raised by the court of enquiry.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 16:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Becke does not show there being any permanent artillery transfers from the 55th after January 1917, so if there as a transfer it would be a temporary attachment. Kges1901 (talk) 17:16, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for thatEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division
The article 59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:42, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 9th (Highland) Infantry Division
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 9th (Highland) Infantry Division you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 02:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 9th (Highland) Infantry Division
The article 9th (Highland) Infantry Division you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:9th (Highland) Infantry Division for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 11:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 9th (Highland) Infantry Division
The article 9th (Highland) Infantry Division you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:9th (Highland) Infantry Division for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 10:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Backlog Banzai
In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

55th
Er, did my repaste remove your additions to the text? If so apols. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 08:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Looking over the change log from my last edit to the current version, I don't see any removed text. So I don't think so?EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 09:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * That's a relief; it's looking very good. Keith-264 (talk) 09:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

55th (West Lancashire) Infantry Division
Hi. I am happy to copy edit this, but I have a lot on and so it will be at least a week, possibly two, before I can look at it in detail. If that is OK by you, I will label it "working" to reserve it. Alternatively, I could leave it and get round to it whenever I do, which leaves open the possibility that another GOCE editor will pick it up and deal with it more rapidly for you. Your choice, let me know which you prefer. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Your offer to work the article is much appreciated, and I do not mind waiting. I have suggested to Kges1901, on the article talkpage, that we await your effort.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project
Thank you :) EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:46, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)
Hi. I have finished this one. It may need a little more polish, but my preference is to let it go through GAN and I'll then give it a rapid once over as you nominate it for ACR. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Once again, thank you.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 11:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)
The article 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)
The article 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2019 (UTC)