User:Enina24/Environmental movement/Marcplummer82 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Enina24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Enina24/Environmental_movement?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Environmental movement

Evaluate the drafted changes
After reading the draft I do agree with the changes that was made to the article. I think that removing the term climate movement is a really good change to make considering that it's about the Environment movement and would not have made sense having in the lead of the paragraph. Also adding references to the lead does help support the facts being stated. After seeing the edits being made for the lead it gives a better understanding about the topic. Although, I do think it could use a little more information on briefly explaining what the major sections are of the article. Yes, I do think that the added content is important to the article being that majority helps with explaining certain sections more in depth and fixing the spelling error and grammar. I do think that the content is up to date. As far the content I think that is missing is more information regarding the future of the environmental movement and update on what accomplishments and struggles they overcame up to this year. For example when talking about how September 2019 the climate strikes were the largest in world history, it does not really go in to detail what went on during the strike and the preparation behind this climate strike. In other words says this strike is the largest in the world but has no supporting details to it. I do think the content is all neutral and does not persuade the reader in anyway. I tested out many of the links and are from reliable sources. For images, I think that towards the end there could more images to be added to overall there is a good amount. Overall, I think the content added does help the article a lot, especially when it comes to the grammatical errors making it an easier read. The last thing that could be improved upon is the 21st century category because it seems very out of place and could use more information that has more detail to it. Moreover, I think the draft does add to the overall quality of the article.