User:Entomological/Rock mechanics/BrettKuzmicz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Entomological


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the Rock Mechanics sandbox draft
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rock mechanics

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content

The content added is very relevant to the topic and is loaded with essential information. The content is up to date. There is nothing in this subtopic which doesn't belong there, and there isn't anything that's missing. This is a relatively short article, so these contributions make up critical core information to the topic.

Tone and Balance

The content is neutral and there is no bias in toward any position. No viewpoints are over or underrepresented and everything is fact based. There is no attempt made by the author to persuade the reader of anything.

Sources and References

There are many new sources added from a diverse variety of authors. The sources are all reliable and represent relevant information to the in text citations which they reference. The content they provide is up to date. All of the links work. These are very effective sources, and no more sources are needed for this subtopic.

Organization

The content is clear, concise, and easy to read. There are zero grammatical or spelling errors. The sentences are well organized, but the first paragraph is long, and the second paragraph is only one sentence, which is a bit unwieldy.

Images and Media

There is no media or images added, but this subtopic would not benefit from having any, so they are not necessary.

Overall, these contributions will be essential to building the Rock mechanics wikipedia page. This is a relatively short article, so these contributions add a lot of important content. This article does a great job making an easy to read clear understanding of tough concepts. The content could be improved by balancing the paragraphs by adding another sentence or two to the second paragraph.