User:Environmentography/Annie Lee Cooper/Cocomelon2005 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

After reviewing the Wikipedia article, I found that the lead section does include a brief description of the article's major sections. The lead section serves as an overview of the entire article and should provide readers with a clear idea of what they can expect to find in the article.

Overall, I think the lead section of this Wikipedia article is well-written and effectively summarizes the major sections of the article. It provides readers with a clear overview of the content of the article, making it easy for them to decide whether to continue reading or not.

Is the content added neutral?

it appears that the content is neutral. The article provides factual information about Annie Lee Wilkerson Cooper's life and actions without showing any bias towards any particular point of view. The language used is objective and does not appear to promote any particular perspective or agenda.

Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Upon review, I feel that the Wikipedia article about Annie Lee Wilkerson Cooper is well-organized. While the article contains brief but detailed information about Cooper's life, there are several issues that detract from its overall cohesiveness.

Firstly, the article lacks a clear introduction. This makes it difficult for readers to understand the context of the information presented in the article.

I felt it lacks a bit organization and coherence. The information presented is scattered and disconnected, making it difficult for readers to fully understand and appreciate Cooper's life and legacy.