User:Eowoyele/User:BriGonz/National Center for Trauma-Informed Care/Eowoyele Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

BriGonz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:BriGonz/National Center for Trauma-Informed Care


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * National Center for Trauma-Informed Care

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your contributions to the paths to healing section of the article were really needed! You were able to provide clear context as to how the "trauma-informed" care seeks to improve the well being of individuals.

I noticed that you left the first part of the paths to healing section from the original article. It may be beneficial to add a few sources that supports that initial part. It was also written in a way that feels a bit opinion based, even more so because it lacks sources. Try to tweak the prose to make it feel more encyclopedic.

I also noticed that you only cite one source through out the paths to healing section. Try to integrate more of your references, to make your words seem even more credible. I know that your contribution to the trauma informed teaching practices section is only a sentence, but I think you should still cite a source, even if it's the official website for the national center for trauma-informed care.