User:Epaniagua2000/Persistent genital arousal disorder/YamilBar Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Epaniagua2000)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Epaniagua2000/Persistent genital arousal disorder


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Epaniagua2000/Persistent genital arousal disorder

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: Very good and somewhat unique lead where it is a diagnosis requirement list versus a traditional word definition, but including sources as well.

Content: Extremely informative and does a good job of informing without a clear bias or message, just factual things about this topic from what it seems.

Tone: The tone was very medical but unobjectively truthful. Even though it was a mature topic, it was described and looked into without an obvious motive and with facts.

References: A good amount of references and sources which are very reliable, credible, and independent.

Overall Impressions: It feels like the beginnings of a very professional and informational wiki page and other than some grammar or vernacular, I would say there isn't much to change.