User:Epezzuto/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article


Nucellar embryony

I've decided to choose this article because it is relevant to my research topic - angiosperm reproduction. In addition, there is not much information on the topic's wikipedia page. The article's content is relevant to the topic - it explains what nucellar embryony is and why it is important. The page is up to date but is missing a ton of relevant information.

The Lead is concise and introduces the article's topic, but should include more information on the topic.

The article's overall status is that it needs work: more information, more talk on the talk page. From its short paragraph, I see that it is well-developed, but could use more explanation. The article is very clear cut and direct. It has one image but could use more. I can see the image is posted correctly and open for all to view. Article should explain more on the background of double fertilization and where nucellar embryony fits into that process. I think it should also explain how it contrasts with other fertilization processes and what makes it so different. Should also go more in depth about the specific types of flowers affected by this. Overall, the article is underdeveloped.