User:Eph17/sandbox

Week 2

Article : Association for Information Systems, link = Association for Information Systems

The article attempts to describe an international non-profit organization. It's very short, it only has the lead-section and one sub-section.

Rated as Stub article, clearly needs improvement

Overall does not provide a good overview.

Even though it's short, claims are fact referenced, more or less reliable sources.

No distraction

Article is not neutral at all. It seems to promote the organization.

Information comes from the organization's website, non-existent link as well

Not much nuanced about details to discuss overrpresented viewpoints. Awards overrepresented. BUt underrepresentation of criticisms, non-existent actually

Check links for plagiarism...one link does not work

A LOT is missing. Sections about it's history of formation, key People, key INstitures

Week 3

I'm evaluating and adding content to this article : Encryption

-Good part : it provides a good introduction to encryption methods and how information online and via any network is protected.

-Weakness : it doesn't provide risks with each type of encryption and doesn't update on proposed solutions.

I chose to update the section that talks about symmetric-key schemes, adding a proposed method to fight leaks. This proposed method was mentioned in an academic article I found searching the online libraries