User:EpicCarnage12/sandbox

Wikipedia article evaluation page: User:EpicCarnage12/Evaluate an Article

Response to peer review:

List of suggested edits and my response.

1. Lead section needs more. Give more information about the major sections in the article.

Response: I am editing a small section of the article that doesn't include the lead to the entire article so I feel this edit isn't necessary for the work I am doing.

2. More content needed in the 1980-1990 section.

Response: While I do believe that there is more information needed there, I am focused more on the 1990-2000 and 2000-present sections. The information I added to the 1980-1990 section was to help fix the time line and nothing more. I have a friend who is waiting to edit this once I am done and that is one of the sections they have information to add to.

3. Minimize news sources and remove the red tagged name and leave it as just a name.

Response: I will remove the red tag and leave it as a name. The sources I used are mostly from the Japanese version of the article so I am going to leave them and the sources I used as is.

4. Lead doesn't help with the organization.

Response: See response for suggestion 1