User:Epicfroggz/Pyrococcus furiosus/Sydneybokor Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Epicfroggz, Aetilghman, Miyamoto4, Trinityt516


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pyrococcus furiosus

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The first few sentences are a great start to a good overview of the microbe, but more information would be beneficial/more sufficient.

Content: Overall, the content provides great detail regarding the microbe especially when discussing its' properties and uses.

Tone and Balance: The article's tone is very neutral and does not indicate any bias.

Sources and references: Several different sources from a variety of websites/journals/articles are included in the article and all appear to be reliable, non-biased sources.

Organization: Grammar and punctuation are consistent throughout the article. The bolding of the subheadings under the section "Uses" confused me at first and originally made me think that they were each their own section. I recommend trying italics or underlining instead.

Images and media: More than one image of the microbe could be beneficial in providing the reader with different examples of the microbe and what it might like look like through the variety of different ways it can be examined macroscopically.