User:Epichippo/Larnax/Meegleague Peer Review

General info
Epichippo
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Epichippo/Larnax
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Larnax

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead- looks really good! Everything seems to be fully cited, which is lovely!

Myth- For the most part, this section is also really good, I would just make sure you're steering clear of language like 'supposedly' and 'potentially', instead maybe saying something like 'while there are many varieties and retellings of the myth, some suggest that xyz...'.

Iconography- Looks good! The only thing I would double check would be making sure all of your stuff is hyperlinked (i.e. Minoan)- it's also totally possible that you did this earlier in the article and I just missed it :)

Other larnax contexts- looks great, would maybe try to find a photo of the Hellenistic Larnax!

Overall- looks great! good article :)