User:Epickerill/Ivy League/Harharharley Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Epickerill/Ivy League


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Epickerill/Ivy_League?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Epickerill/Ivy_League?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Epickerill/Ivy_League?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content added to this article is well written and concise. I think it might be helpful In some of the more bulkier sections to add more separation so that there is not so much text to digest at once.

The content is well organized. I appreciate the subsections of chronological order that makes it easy to follow the changes within the Ivy League.

There is a good job conducted of keeping the content added neutral.

One thing I might suggest is to include a quote or two to reinforce the proof of the information being provided. I am also wondering if in the top section there could be additional citations added? Where is this information coming from? How do we know this is reliable information?

One additional comment is maybe to separate the sections on the different Ivy League schools to make it easier to identify the changes within each one. For example, a Cornell section of changes and Princeton changes especially within the 19th and early 20th centuries section.

This could be helpful in making sure there is clear information being produced.

The sources are current and have a large range of credibility across different types of publications.

Overall, this is a great draft, and comparing it with the current wiki page for the Ivy League, it is obvious that this addition is needed!