User:Eric1997uw/Valee/Grizzbuzz Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Eric1997uw)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Eric1997uw/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes but the intro could be bulked up with a little more info.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, information is all covered again elsewhere in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Sort of. Honestly I think it's too short and leaves out information that is relevant, to the topic, like where is he based out of/where does he currently live.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes all is relevant
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * It seems so.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * It seems like there is a lot of information about his music and early life but really none about his current life and personal life.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, Bias was kept out very well
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Nope, not really any view points on this topic to deal with
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * Nope, no persuasion

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes It looks like sourcing for new material is good.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Looks like you have good sources. Im not sure if you can find some to expand on his current life(living situation, names of children, etc) but if you can that would be one thing to add.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yep

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, well written, very easy to read and understand.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Did notice any spelling or grammar errors. Reads very easily.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yep good organization

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No, even though they will be hard to come by, if you can that would be a very good addition to the page.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Very good additions so far. There is still more that should be added about his personal life and current life but that's a really good start.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Section on the Music is very well written and very well sourced, I don't see a lot that needs to be added there.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Pictures is a big one that would help, knowing what he looks like is something I'd like to see added

Overall evaluation
You have a great start and have added quite a big of good information compared to what was there to start with. The Pictures are something that would be an awesome addition if you can manage to find some as well as more information about his personal life. But really good start and keep going.