User:EricDart/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Deep sea creature

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I enjoy reading about deep sea creatures.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article provided more detailed information than was necessary. The overall feeling of the article was sloppy, with some sections not going into enough detail and including information that wasn't relevant to the subject title, for example mentioning the reproduction habits in the section covering the lack of light. Some of the images provided were overly cartoonish in appearance. The sources used in writing the article are relatively new with the newest being from 2014, but could use updating. In the talk section, some were suggesting to merge this article with the deep sea communities article and also asks for more reliable sources were not reliable enough. I would say that the article is in need of a major overhaul to improve the flow of the article, along with improving the quality and quantity of information provided. The article does cover a broad range in subjects related to deep sea fish, but they do not feel connected enough to the main topic.