User:EricDart/Müggelsee/BenBri Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? EricDart

(provide username) EricDart


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EricDart/M%C3%BCggelsee?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The intro is good and tells info about the lake characteristics and location.

Content
The information in each section is relevant and useful for understanding the limnology of the lake. It is easy to understand and conveyed good.

Tone and Balance
The article is neutral and unbiased

Sources and References
All the sources are relevant and up to date and not too old. All of the information in the article is cited as well.

Organizations
All of the data is setup in a way that isn't confusing and isn't confusing. The parts in the limnology section are all in the correct sections and it goes together well.

Images
There are no images in the article.

Overall
The article is good and the data is helpful in understanding the limnological aspects of the lake. There were no grammatical errors that stood out and it's well written.