User:Ericairenepenuela/Agustín Hernández Navarro/EdgarL327 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) User:Ericairenepenuela

Agustín Hernández Navarro


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ericairenepenuela/Agustín Hernández Navarro


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Agustín Hernández Navarro

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The lead/ first paragraph does include new information compared to the original article. The introductory sentence does describe the person and the topic of the article.
 * I can’t say for sure if the lead includes brief descriptions of the article’s major section’s. It does include a good amount of info for a salting paragraph before it leads into the Childhood and Early life paragraph of the article. I personally can’t say for sure if the Lead consist of only the first paragraph, but each section of the article if separated by a bold header describing the subject’s information within that section.
 * Within the Overview section there is some new information such as describing what Agustín in mostly notable fro when it come to his architecture design. The rest does contain information from the original article but switched around. The lead is quick and easy to understand what the subject of article is about.
 * The content within the article provides a lot of good information relating to Agustín Hernández Navarro. From his biography to career sections and even the notable public and private works. Every section is related to the subject and is relevant to the topic.
 * The content within the article does seem up to date, the reference/ cited sources are up to date with Agustín, from accolades to the works that the subject has worked on over the years. Each topic is related to Agustín, so the contents don’t feel as if they don’t belong. As for the Wikipedia equity gap, the content does address information that wasn’t in the original article. The Subjects within the article does include a underrepresented population/ topic that being foreign architecture, Mexican architecture in this case.
 * The tone of this article is very neutral, it doesn’t feel one sided, no opinions or the use of First person point of view when describing anything within the article. It presents the subjects within the article and describes within each subsection. No, there is no persuasion to go for one side over the other, overall this article drafts is very neutral in terms of writing.
 * For sources, they do seem reliable for the most part. Most of the sources include the information and I’ve also seen one that includes a transcript of an interview. That doesn’t mean it can be faked or what not but the information within the articles tend to coincide with other articles when it comes to information. There was two sources I couldn’t fully navigate, I don’t know if the URL was cited incorrectly or if the source relocated the reader into a homepage before the main article, but overall the other references can be located by clicking the links. The second didn’t load.
 * The sources completely reflect what is in the article draft all the information can be found within the cited sources. The sources that are different are from different articles sites and webpages with different writers. But there are some links in the reference page that redirect the reader to the same article. Majority of the sources work, I only had a problem with two but that could just be from my laptop/ search engine I used.
 * The content is well written with some slight grammatical errors but overall very good. It’s organized, easy to read and follow, and informative about Agustín. The article is broken down into subsections such as Childhood to Career than to other subsections such as Notable Public Works to Accolades and Awards. Overall, the article is very organized and well written with only a few grammatical errors.
 * There is one image in the article draft which is found at the top of the draft. The image is captioned underneath and includes a small description of the photo. The image does seem to follow the copyright regulation. It’s license is file under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.
 * Overall my impression of the draft is very good. It’s information if far more than what’s located in the original article from Wikipedia, and is very organized and easy to follow. The strength of the draft is the details information added by the user. If the was anything in the article that needed more content that would improve the draft is the more info about the architecture that Agustín worked on such as the size of the building from width to height in some of the sections.