User:Ericairenepenuela/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:H6b96bu7/Dami%C3%A1n_Ortega?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It was assigned to me

Lead Section

 * The lead section includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the topic of the article which is about the artist Damian Ortega
 * The lead does not include a brief description of the articles major sections
 * The lead does not include any information that is not present in the article (it shouldn't)
 * The lead is concise and it is not overly detailed, however it could include more detail about the articles major sections

Content

 * All of the article's content is relevant to the topic
 * All of the content is up-to-date
 * There is no missing content or content that does not belong
 * The article does not deal directly with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps but it does address the issue of historically underrepresented populations, being Latinx or Latine artists who have historically been marginalized in the art world

Tone and Balance

 * The article is neutral and non bias
 * There are no claims which appear heavily bias toward a particular position
 * There are no view points that are over or under represented
 * Minority and fringe viewpoints are accurately described
 * The writer does not try to persuade the reader in favour of any position

Sources and References

 * The facts of the article are backed up by reliable source information
 * The sources are thorough and reflect the available literature on the topic
 * The sources are current
 * The sources are written by a diverse spectrum, including a source written by an individual from a historically marginalized group
 * The sources mainly include website sources, maybe more books or journal sources could have been Included
 * All of the source links work

Organization and Writing Quality

 * The article is well written, concise and easy to read
 * There are a couple grammatical errors
 * The article is well organized and broken down into sections that reflect the major points related to the artist

Images and Media

 * The article includes an images of the artist
 * The image does not have a caption
 * The file adheres to the Wikipedia copyright regulations because it was retrieved from a Wikimedia commons source
 * The image is laid out in an appealing way

Talk Page Discussion

 * There are no talk page discussions on this article
 * It is not yet rated or part of any Wikiprojects
 * Wiki discusses this article differently than we would in class because the article deals with facts and non bias information. In class discussions we are able to interject opinion, this article is not opinion based, it is fact based.

Overall Impressions

 * The overall article is well written and very informative. It is clear and non bias while delivering pertinent information about the artist
 * The article's strengths are the Early Life, Career and Legacy sections. It has good up to date references from reliable sources
 * The article could be improved by adding another source from a book or journal article and adding a little more information in the Lead.
 * The article is very well developed and thorough, I would say 99.5% complete