User:Ericaw5/African Independence Movements/Imwesley Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? I am reviewing Ericaw5's Article on African Independence Movements
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ericaw5/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * There is no definitive lead necessary as the article summarizes multiple African Independence movements within its own lead
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * I personally did not understand the lead/ first sentence since it only provided a very broad background about the country. It only indicated the Algerian's involvement in World War I and then promptly discussing tension post World War II addressed by Muslim Algerians. There was no information in regards to who and when Algeria was colonized nor the building resentment that could have given clear context to the lead up for independence
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * This is not applicable for the section she is elaborating upon.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * This is not applicable for the section she is elaborating upon
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The article lead itself is concise and to the point which enable Erica to immediately dive into the content she was interested in elaborating upon.

Lead evaluation

 * No large comments to the lead section of the article itself, but I believe that she should provide more analysis in regards to the lead up to independence from their occupation to the spark.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * (+)I found that the 6 articles she has referenced for this topic were very well chosen since it not only encompassed the pertinent details about the independence movements themselves but also the surrounding sentiment of the Algerian populace themselves. The subsection which discussed Women's role in Algeria's independence was remarkable and pivotal, in my own opinion, as it provides another lenses of the hero's contributing to their nations liberation. Additionally, the many aspects of the impact of their independent movement provided context to the motives of other countries independence movement.
 * (-) Although this can also fall under the organization review in this peer review article, I had difficulty distinguishing the progression of the independence movements that were analyzed.
 * It was clear with the first paragraph under the subsection "the fight for independence" of the spark that led to the movement and the key political actors involved. However, it starts off with May 1945 while the "leading up to the fight for independence" discussing about their grievances post 1947.
 * I was confused with when the "Outcome of Independence" section as well since it was written that after independence the Algerian civil war began. there was discrepancy that Algeria won independence in 1962(addressed in the last sentence of "the fight for independence") but the outbreak of the civil war began in 1954 until 1962 (as shown in the link that was attached to her section)
 * Additionally, the section of Women's involvement in independence did not present any information pertaining post independence activities but only of their contributions during the war
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Based upon the sources she has cited, They are all up to date as the most recent is from 2019 while the latest is from 2001.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Other than the things addressed above I am not exactly sure what exactly is missing other than elaborating more on post independence and the impacts it may have had for others.

Content evaluation

 * The content is very detailed and concentrated on what needed to be discussed in the topic however, there may be a need to provide more evidence or knowledge in certain aspects of the topic.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * The tone is relatively neutral with some instances of the text being vague ie the word probably
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No it is very unbiased and information focused
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The information pertaining to women's role post independence seems underrepresented since there were no clear information about it
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No it did not and is a well written article because of its unbiased writing.

Tone and balance evaluation

 * the tone and balance was very well implemented in her sandbox.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * It is difficult to see what sources she used exactly due to the structure of how she placed it. However from what I managed to distinguish, the new content is very credible given the original article did not have any citations at all
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * All sources seem to encompass all aspects in regards to the independence movements that may have transpired in previously colonized Algeria.
 * Are the sources current?
 * These sources have a diversity of relatively current sources ranging from 2001 - 2019.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * There were no links to click on but all of them seem to be books and articles available only through the Berkeley library data pages.

Sources and references evaluation

 * Great use of sources with a diversity of viewpoints about the progression of Algeria's liberation from France. But I do hope that she will be able to cite her references and bibliography separately.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The given content is very well written but date wise it is very confusing. However it is still concise and the intent of explaining the independence movements in Algeria is well noted.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * There are a few instances where I couldn't tell if she wrote the part or it was the original writing of the work.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Very well distributed with the subsections within the topic being clearly organized and structured.

Organization evaluation

 * The organization is amazing and gives plenty of room to add more subsections if more information is founded.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Overall, the content added has improved the overall coverage intended by the article which it once lacked. There is more insight to what needed to be addressed in the article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * More clarity of the internal factors that were driven by the Algerian people to gain independence and liberation.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Possibly organizing the structure into proper categories and making it more chronological would improve the content of her assigned section of the article. Particularly since there were some jumping around dates and missing information.

Overall evaluation

 * A very well drafted and constructed article that not only provides more information to the article but allows future readers to acquire better understanding of the overall history of liberation movements in Algeria during colonial times.