User:Ericksmd3839/Huntington's disease/Schmidtj5997 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ericksmd3839


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ericksmd3839/Huntington%27s_disease?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Huntington's disease

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

- Overall: I think the information you contributed to the article is quite helpful and beneficial knowledge for new readers of the article to learn about Huntington's disease. I found it helpful the way you separated your new information from the previous information in the article by making it bold and noticeable for others to see (for us in the class).

- Content: The content you added is very relevant to the topic and I personally felt made the article more easily understandable. The content you added in the article was helpful in the areas you added by giving more detailed information in areas where it may have been a bit more vague compared to other sections within the article. There were a few areas where there was some grammatical and spelling errors so reading the article edits through again should eliminate those. When reading through your sandbox article, I did find it difficult at times to understand what part of the original article I was reading and in what sections they belonged in. I feel that section titles would make your edits a bit easier to follow and understand in the big picture.

- Suggestions: These are just suggestions on how I personally think the article can be improved and taken even higher, but aren't required. I think that some type of visual that displays the genetic sex link of Huntington's disease could be beneficial for readers to understand how the disease is passed on or developed. I know that the final draft is due coming up shortly, but I think that it could be beneficial to add content to the Epidemiology section of your article if anything can be added. I say this just because we are in an Epidemiology course and this could be beneficial overall.

Overall your additions to the article are fantastic and contribute very useful. The new content adds a new depth and greater understanding to Huntington's disease.