User:Ericmaik/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Recruitment
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

I am interested in the overall process of finding reliable and suitable candidates for job positions.

Lead

 * Guiding questions

The lead includes a detailed and concise description of the article along with the major aspects or sections connected to it as well. The lead is also consistent with only providing the information that is given in the article rather then being too overly detailed.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

The article provides content that answers the basic questions individuals might have about the recruitment process and the last time it was edited was September 29, 2020. The information in the article stays mostly in the lines of recruitment, it informs us of formal corrupt practices in the field as well.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

The article is written without bias towards one particular point, it simply reviews the process in which is needed along with the many other factors but does not lean to any certain side when expressing the topic.


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

The article has a wide variety from online websites, to journals, even university textbooks. All or most sources play a revalence to the article with the exception of few underlining other information people might want to look into when reading about this topic. The authors themselves are included in a range from university professors to book and online writers. All the sources given with links do still work.


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

The article is overall very well written with no grammar or spelling issues, it provides a clear and concise understanding of all the topics related to recruitment along with a good outline of the topics broken down into the main areas of the topic.


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

The article does not include any images.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

This article is involved with WikiProjects Business, which is a collaborative effort on improving the business articles on Wikipedia. It is rated as start class on the quality scale and was given a rating of high importance on Wikipedia's important scale. We have not yet gone over this topic in class but i can not wait to learn more about it.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

The article was pretty well developed, it covered the primary aspects it listed in an organized an orderly way along with providing the key information towards learning more about the whole process. I believe the article could be more improved by incorporating maybe more images or visual references to give the readers just that little more detail they may desire. but other then that i cant really think of anything else to add:)


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: