User:Erikagpaul/sandbox

Article Evaluation -Glass Ceiling

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? The information in the glass ceiling article is relevant and uses references from great peer reviewed articles that I found during my research.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? This article is neutral and is not based on opinion. The article is based on reliable sources of information.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I believe that the viewpoints are not over or under represented. It covers each section with researched facts that you can find more information in detail.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes, the links work and the source support claims in this article. For example one of the links led me to the Sage database and was linked to a great article that I will use for my research.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Yes, the sources that are used in this article are neutral sources and have been referenced with good sources.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? No, the information appears to be up to date and current.

Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The talk does mention that the article is claiming that the glass ceiling is a fact, rather than a theory. I guess that I would have to agree that is a good point.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Yes, it's part of Wiki Education Projects.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? I would say that Wiki identifies this topic as a fact, instead of a concept.