User:Erinea/Ophryotrocha/Lhov14 Peer Review

General info
Erinea
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Erinea/Ophryotrocha
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ophryotrocha

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is very strong, and I think the wording was great. The lead easily transitions into the section Erin added about the sexual systems of Ophryotrocha. It was interesting to red how the sizes of the worms can depend on the whether or not they are deep sea worms- I was wondering if there was any other morphological changes due to the depth, or if their were morphological differences in sex as well? This might not be something thats been researched though. The sexual systems sections was very well written and has a plethora of essential information. I think my main critique of this draft is to check your punctuation, there are some missing periods and such. The tone of the draft was very neutral. Some of your citations are red?- I think if you go into the citation, it tells you what is missing. Other than that I think you did a great job building on this Wikipedia article!! :)