User:ErwanCouturier/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
WikiProject Former countries

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because it seemed interesting, it matters because it represent historical accuracy. At first sight it seemed confusing because of all of the linked pages, but after looking a bit closer it looked well organized.

Evaluate the article
The lead is concise and describe its topic neatly. The content seem all up to date and also seem to have all of the information it needs. Since the article talks about historical events and is a wikiproject who is active, meaning it's currently being worked on, the content doesn't have any obvious bias and simply states facts. All of the sources are linked to other wiki pages, which have their own sources, so I think all of the sources are relevant and up to date. The article is confusing at first sight, but is well organized upon further inspection. The articles does have a view pictures of the subject that seem to be changing everyday "Pictures of the day". Since it is a WikiProject, the Talk page is about improving the article by bringing more accuracy. I think the page's strength is that it backs up every point by linking everything to another wiki pages which brings more detail. The article seem well developped.