User:Esalo001/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Visual rhetoric

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am interested in and affected by visual rhetoric. It is important because it affects everyone in their everyday lives, especially in today's digital era. My preliminary impression of the article is that visual rhetorical studies are important to be understood.

Evaluate the article
The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic. The lead does not include a brief description of the sections. The lead does not include information that is not present in the article. The lead is concise, not overly detailed.

The article's content is relevant and up to date. There is not any missing content or content that does not belong. This article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

The article is neutral, no claims that appear biased towards a particular position. Viewpoints were neither overrepresented or underrepresented. The article does not attempt to persuade the reader.

The sources are thorough, current, and written by a diverse spectrum of authors. I would not say there are better sources available after taking a look.

The article is well written and well organized. I do not believe there were spelling or grammatical errors.

The article includes images that enhance the readers understanding of the topic. They are captioned and adhere to the copyright regulations.

There are a few conversations posted on the talk page discussing and questioning the relevance of some of the information. The article is rated a B.

The article's overall status is that it is good. The strengths are the organization of the information and pictures. The article could be improved by removing possibly irrelevant information. I would say overall the article is well developed.