User:Eschaef2/1886 Charleston earthquake/Mcoope17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

1886 Charleston earthquake group


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Eschaef2/1886 Charleston earthquake


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 1886 Charleston earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think that you have a good start to your drafted changes from the article. After reviewing the original article myself I noticed there was not a lot of information, particularly in the damage and aftermath section. It seems that you are thinking of adding to the damage section, and you seem to have a good start on that. I would suggest adding to the aftermath section as well, and possibly talking about the economic and political effects that the earthquake had. I also think your idea of expanding on the 435 aftershocks is good because that is an interesting fact that could be discussed further. Finally, I would suggest adding new headings such as "aftershocks" or "economic effects" so that there's more organization.