User:Eschaef2/1886 Charleston earthquake/Phoebewolf Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Eschaef2, Johnskae, Mattleviss, Nateherbkersman


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eschaef2/1886_Charleston_earthquake?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 1886 Charleston earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Everything in article is very relevant to the article topic, and all of it was written very well. No information was a distractor, and no information did not pertain to the topic. You did a good job at keeping the article neutral and keeping your own opinions out of your article. There are no biased sentences, and there is no position being picked. All viewpoints are represented and distributed evenly, and I like how you made your own section rather than just adding to a section. All of your citation look great, and the links seem to work well. The sources very fitting for what you are talking about. I see that you have two references but are only using one in the actual article, are you planning on adding more to your article using that reference? The references you are using are good and seem to have natural viewpoint, and don't seem biased at all. All information is to date. Continue adding to your article, and revising it to make it read even better, but this is a great start!!