User:Eschied/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Standard of care - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I believe many people know the importance of the "Standard of care", but do not fully understand the meaning and work that goes into it. The "standard" is not always the same in every situation so you have to take the situation into consideration every time you are at a task.

Evaluate the article
This article has a great lead section. It introduces the topic very well. The leading paragraph helps you understand what you are going to read about and gives the main points. In this case they were not too descriptive. The lead was right on, straight to the point.

The contents in the article are firm and match what the introduction claims the article is about. All the content is clear and detailed well.

The article is all informative the is no bias content. The "medical standard of care" seems to have more information than all other categories.

All of the sources and links seem to be accurate. The sources all back up the information that was taken from them.

The organization of the article is easy to read and understand. It is organized in a very simple way. The article was written by a very grammatically inclined group of individuals.

The article has little to no pictures to refer to. Pictures don't fit into the information given.

The article seems to have been reviewed by many editors.

My overall thoughts are good on this article. It is very informative, but also strait to the point. It is easy to read and not too long. The article was written well and has good information and sources to back it up. I was not overwhelmed with boredom when reading the article.