User:Escritora-2000/Regeneración/Rafahorle Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Escritora-2000

Link to draft you're reviewing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Escritora-2000/Regeneraci%C3%B3n?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Regeneración

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead has not been updated.

Content

The content of the article is up to date and since it is about a Latino newspaper, it deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. As I am not very acquainted with La Generacion I can not comment on whether there are any gaps in the content. However, it all seems relevant.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the article is good as it is neutral and does not attempt to convince the reader of anything. However, it does make claims that might need to be backed up by scholars or data such as the popularity of the newspaper and its anti religious sentiment.

Sources and References

The sources are reliable and up to date. I could not click the links since they were on the sandbox, but when I looked the titles up the pages showed up except for "Las vacas, viesca, palomas". The sources mainly come from Latino authors themselves and are diverse as it ranges from biographical books to scholarly documents.

Organization

The content is concise and easy to read. The sections are divided well and the content reflects the name of the sections.

Images and Media

N/A

Overall Impression

As a first draft, I think this article is good. The information is relevant, well written and from reliable sources. For the future, I would recommend making sure to not make any connections that were not already made by academics. I think adding section about the most prominent editions of the newspaper and pictures of them would be interesting!